|
Ref: 06/2007
Date: 26
February 2007
PCHR Organizes a Symposium on “One
Year after Swearing in the New PLC”
On 25 February 2007, PCHR organized a symposium
entitled “One Year after Swearing in the New PLC,” in the Service Club
lecture hall in Khan Yunis. The event was organized to discuss the most
notable internal and external obstacles that have faced the second PLC in
its first year in office since taking office on 18 February 2006, as well as
the Council’s achievements and failures. The speakers were Dr. Ahmad Bahar
(Acting PLC Speaker), Dr. Mohammad Hejazi (PLC member), Dr. Ahmad Dahlan
(lecturer at Al-Azhar University), and Mr. Sayyed Baraka (President of the
People’s Forum). Representatives of civil society and political parties,
academics, society leaders, and concerned citizens attended the symposium.
In his opening speech, Mr. Hamdi Saqqoura
(Director of PCHR’s Democratic Development Unit) stated that the second
parliamentary elections were an important event in Palestinian political
life. These elections were fair and transparent by the international
testimonies, and were an event of national pride for Palestinians. He also
stated that these elections and their results were accompanied by extreme
difficulties, the most notable of which are:
-
Escalation of
Israeli war crimes against Palestinians, including the detention of PLC
members and government ministers;
-
Boycott and siege
imposed by the international community against the Palestinian people after
the elections; and
-
Internal fighting
and conflict in the occupied Palestinian territory.
Dr. Ahmad Bahar, the acting PLC speaker, talked
about the legislation passed by the Council since it started to function. He
pointed to a number of legislations approved by the President, and others
awaiting his approval. In addition, he pointed that the Council issued a
number of important decisions on:
-
Forming a
Commission to investigate the attack on Jericho prison in March 2006;
-
Outlawing
political detention;
-
Respecting the
decisions of Palestinian courts.
On the monitoring front, Bahar stated that the
Council held 12 sessions to hear testimonies of government ministers.
Bahar also talked about the obstacles that faced
the Council, most notably the political, economic, and security siege, and
the abduction of nearly one-third of the Council members by Israeli forces.
Dr. Ahmad Dahlan stated that the extreme
difficulties facing the PLC were caused by two shocks taken by the two main
political parties. The first shock was that the ruling party Fatah, which
held a monopoly on power for a decade, found itself in a sudden outside the
power circle. This led to a disturbance in its balance; and led to it
committing acts it should have not committed. The second shock was the
overwhelming joy of victory by Hamas, the winner of the elections, which did
not foresee such a landslide victory.
Dr. Dahlan divided the first year of the second
PLC into four parts:
1-
Inability of Hamas
to reach a real political partnership with others;
2-
Forming a
government from one political party (Hamas);
3-
Kidnapping of PLC
members and ministers; and
4-
Infighting and
conflict over power.
Mr. Sayyed Baraka stated that the Mecca
Agreement between the conflicting parties should have been reached earlier
in order to preserve the blood of innocent people who fell during the
infighting. He wondered as to who will pay the bill for the belated
understanding. He also stated that Palestinians practiced democracy during
the elections, but that the participants were not democratic. He asked as to
how we can claim to be democratic when we readily take up arms to resolve
disputes. He said, “We practiced democracy without a democratic culture.”
Dr. Mohammad Hejazi, PLC member, stated that the
Council did not register any notable achievements in its first year. He
considered the main obstacles facing the PLC to be:
1-
Electing the
Council’s Board from one party, Hamas, without participation from other
parties;
2-
Detention of PLC
members, closure of border crossings, and checkpoints throughout the West
Bank, which disrupted the normal functioning of the Council.
He stressed the lack of democratic culture, as
evidenced by the infighting. And he called for unity of government and
authority, as well as the unity of arms under one authority to protect
national institutions.
The floor was opened for discussion after the
speeches; and a number of important points were raised by the participants.
The attendance asked the Council to play a more proactive role in stopping
infighting, and in improving living condition in light of increased
unemployment and poverty due to international sanctions.
|